"My company is dormant, so nothing can happen": What the Companies Act actually requires before MCA strikes you off
A founder shuts down operations after a pivot, stops filing annual returns to save money, and assumes the company will quietly fade away. Eighteen months later a STK-5 notice appears against the CIN, the bank account is frozen, and every director's DIN is flagged. An inactive private limited company is not a safe company — doing nothing is the fastest route to involuntary strike-off under Section 248, director disqualification under Section 164(2), and surviving personal liability under Section 250. This guide shows exactly how MCA identifies non-compliant companies in the MCA21 V3 era, what the STK-1, STK-5 and STK-7 notices look like, the 30-day reply window that runs from Gazette publication, and the live CCFS-2026 relief scheme (deadline 15 July 2026) that can fix a default cheaply if you act now.
Harun Raaj
Chartered Accountant · Harun Raaj & Associates
A founder shuts down operations after a pivot, stops filing the annual returns to "save money," and assumes the company will quietly fade away. Eighteen months later a STK-5 notice appears against the company's CIN on the MCA portal, the bank account is frozen, and every director's DIN is flagged. The company did not fade away — it became a strike-off target. And in 2026, with the Registrar running data-driven sweeps and a fire-disrupted MCA21 system catching up on backlogs, the gap between "inactive" and "struck off" has never been shorter.
This is the part most founders get wrong: an inactive private limited company is not a safe company. Doing nothing is the single fastest route to involuntary strike-off, director disqualification, and personal exposure. Here is exactly how the Ministry of Corporate Affairs identifies non-compliant companies, what each notice looks like, and what you must do — including a closing 2026 window that can clean this up cheaply if you act before mid-July.
What the law actually requires
The power to strike a company off lives in Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016.
Under Section 248(1), the Registrar of Companies (ROC) can remove a company's name on its own motion (suo moto) on four grounds:
- The company has failed to commence business within one year of incorporation;
- The company has not carried on any business or operation for the two immediately preceding financial years and has not applied for dormant status under Section 455;
- The subscribers to the memorandum have not paid the subscription money they undertook to pay, and a declaration in Form INC-20A (commencement of business) has not been filed within 180 days of incorporation; or
- On physical verification of the registered office under Section 12(9), the company is found not to be carrying on any business.
That fourth ground is new in practice and dangerous. Since the Companies (Incorporation) Third Amendment Rules, 2022 empowered ROCs to physically verify registered offices, a company that exists only on paper — no signage, no documents, no one present — can be tagged for strike-off after a single field visit, regardless of what its filings say.
Separately, under Section 248(2), a company can apply for voluntary strike-off in Form STK-2 (fee Rs 10,000) after extinguishing liabilities and passing a special resolution. That is the controlled exit. This article is about the other kind — the one the ROC initiates against you.
Critically, strike-off does not erase liability. Section 250 provides that even after dissolution, the directors, managers and officers remain liable as if the company had not been dissolved, and the company's assets remain available to discharge its liabilities.
How MCA actually identifies non-compliant companies
The Registrar no longer waits for complaints. Identification in the MCA21 V3 era is largely automated:
- Annual filing defaults. The system flags companies that have not filed Form AOC-4 (financial statements) and Form MGT-7/MGT-7A (annual return) for two or more consecutive financial years. Two years of non-filing maps directly onto the Section 248(1)(c) ground.
- INC-20A non-filing. Newly incorporated companies that never file the commencement-of-business declaration within 180 days surface on a dedicated default list — this is the most common trigger for one-year-old companies.
- DIR-3 KYC failures. When directors skip annual KYC, their DINs are deactivated. A board with all DINs deactivated is a strong inactivity signal.
- Dormant-but-not-declared. Companies showing no business for two years that never filed Form MSC-1 to obtain dormant status under Section 455 are exactly the population Section 248 targets. Dormant status is a shield; not claiming it removes the shield.
- Registered office verification. Field officers verify addresses under Section 12(9); failure of verification feeds the strike-off pipeline.
- STK-2 rejections and cross-checks against GST and bank data round out the picture.
In MCA21 V3, these flags are visible on the company master data and cascade: a strike-off flag against the CIN, deactivated DINs, and — under Section 164(2) — disqualification of every director of a company that has failed to file financial statements or annual returns for three continuous years.
What the notice actually looks like — the three-form sequence
Strike-off is not a single letter. It is a defined sequence under Rule 7 onward:
Form STK-1 — Notice of intention. The ROC issues STK-1 to the company and all directors stating the intention to remove the name and asking for representations, with supporting documents, within 30 days from the date of the notice. It is sent to the registered office and directors' addresses.
Form STK-5 — Public show-cause notice. The ROC publishes STK-5 (a) on the MCA portal under the company's CIN, (b) in the Official Gazette, and (c) in one English and one regional-language newspaper where the registered office is located. This is the notice founders "discover" too late. The 30-day clock runs from the date of Gazette publication, not from when you happen to see it. STK-6 is the corresponding public notice format.
Form STK-7 — Notice of dissolution. If no valid objection is received, the ROC strikes the name off, issues STK-7, and publishes it in the Official Gazette. From the date of publication of STK-7, the company stands dissolved and ceases to exist as a legal entity.
Miss the window at STK-1 or STK-5 and you do not get to "explain later" — you escalate to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Under Section 252, a company, member, creditor or workman aggrieved by strike-off can appeal to the NCLT within 3 years of the STK-7 order; the ROC itself can move to restore within 20 years. Restoration typically requires filing all overdue returns, paying additional fees and costs, and convincing the Tribunal it is "just" to restore.
Practical implications — what ignoring this actually costs
- Director disqualification (Section 164(2)): three years of non-filing disqualifies you from being a director in any company — not just the defaulting one — for five years, and bars reappointment.
- DIN deactivation: a deactivated DIN blocks you from filing on, or being appointed to, other companies until reactivated.
- Personal liability survives (Section 250): creditors, tax authorities and litigants can still pursue the directors and the company's assets after dissolution.
- Penalty for false STK-2 declarations (Section 249/448): if a company applies for voluntary strike-off concealing liabilities, directors face liability and penalties for false statements.
- Frozen banking and lost CIN: once struck off, the bank account is inoperable and contracts in the company's name become unenforceable until restoration.
- A costly NCLT restoration with full back-filing, professional fees and Tribunal costs — far more than the routine annual compliance you skipped.
Step-by-step: what to do
- Check your status today. On mca.gov.in, look up your CIN under Master Data and the strike-off / STK notice lists. Confirm whether any STK-1 or STK-5 is live against you and note the date.
- If a notice is live, respond within 30 days. File a written objection with the ROC attaching evidence that the company is active or that interests would be harmed — bank statements, GST returns, employee/PF records, creditor confirmations, pending contracts or litigation.
- Clear the filing backlog. File all pending AOC-4 and MGT-7/MGT-7A, complete DIR-3 KYC for every director, and file DPT-3 (note: the FY 2025-26 DPT-3 due date was extended to 31 July 2026 via General Circular No. 02/2026 dated 19 June 2026, following the 5 June 2026 MCA Data Centre fire).
- If genuinely inactive, claim dormant status. File Form MSC-1 under Section 455 to obtain dormant status — a legitimate, low-cost holding state — instead of letting two idle years trigger Section 248.
- If you want to close, do it voluntarily. File Form STK-2 (fee Rs 10,000) after settling liabilities and passing a special resolution — a clean exit on your terms, not the ROC's.
- Use the CCFS-2026 window now. The Companies Compliance Facilitation Scheme, 2026 (General Circular No. 01/2026) is open from 15 April to 15 July 2026 and gives non-compliant companies a one-time chance to complete pending filings, apply for dormant status, or strike off inactive companies at sharply reduced fees (reported reliefs include up to ~90% off additional fees, dormant status at half fee, and strike-off at ~25% of fee). With the deadline roughly two and a half weeks away, this is the cheapest route to fix a default before the ROC acts.
- If already struck off, file under Section 252 with the NCLT within the 3-year window, with all overdue returns ready.
FAQ
Q: My company has done no business for two years but I never got any notice. Am I safe?
No. Two financial years of no operations without dormant status is itself a Section 248(1) ground. The absence of a notice means it hasn't happened yet — file your pending returns or claim dormant status under Section 455 before it does.
Q: The 30-day reply period — does it start when I receive the notice?
For STK-5 it starts from the date of Official Gazette publication, not when you personally see it. Always treat the published date as the clock-start, which is why monitoring your CIN on the MCA portal matters.
Q: Can directors be disqualified even if the company is dormant?
Disqualification under Section 164(2) is triggered by non-filing of financial statements/annual returns for three continuous years. Properly declared dormant companies still file the reduced returns required of them; doing nothing at all is what triggers disqualification.
Q: We were struck off. Can we get the company back?
Yes, via appeal to the NCLT under Section 252 — within 3 years of the STK-7 order for the company/members/creditors. You will need to file all overdue documents and pay fees and costs, and the Tribunal must find restoration just. It is doable but materially more expensive than staying compliant.
For a compliance audit of your company, visit pvtltd.co
Need help with this?
Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.