Private Discretionary Trust vs HUF: 2026 Planning Guide

Legal basis: Income-tax Act, 1961 — Sections 2(31), 161 and 164(1). Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (as amended 2005) — Section 6. Indian Trusts Act, 1882 — Sections 7, 9. Registration Act, 1908 — Sections 17, 49. Effective: AY 2026-27 under the 1961 Act; Income-tax Act, 2025 applies from Tax Year 2026-27 (1 April 2026). Last updated: October 2026.

Two structures dominate succession planning for Indian business families, promoter groups after an exit, and HNIs managing multi-generational wealth: the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and the private discretionary trust. Both are widely used, both are frequently confused with each other, and the choice between them carries material consequences for tax, control, asset protection and family continuity.

That choice now sits across two legal regimes at once. The Income-tax Act, 1961 governs AY 2026-27 (FY 2025-26) — the returns currently being filed. The Income-tax Act, 2025 came into force on 1 April 2026 (Section 1(3)) and applies from Tax Year 2026-27 onward. A trust or HUF created now falls under ITA 2025 from tax year 2026-27, including its first part-year; the 1961 Act matters only for existing structures' FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27) returns. ITA 2025 retains the core concepts used below — "maximum marginal rate" is defined in Section 2(70) — but always confirm the new section numbers in the gazette text before citing one.

What Is an HUF?

An HUF is a creature of Hindu personal law and a distinct taxable "person" under Section 2(31) of the ITA 1961, which expressly includes a Hindu Undivided Family. The Hindu Succession Act applies to persons who are Hindu, Buddhist, Jaina or Sikh by religion (Section 2) — only families governed by Hindu law can form one.

Coparceners hold an interest in HUF property by birth. Since the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughter of a coparcener in a Mitakshara family "by birth become[s] a coparcener in her own right [in] the same manner as the son" (Section 6(1)) — daughters are equal coparceners with the same rights, including the right to demand partition.

For AY 2026-27, the HUF is a separate taxable entity with its own basic exemption — nil tax up to ₹4,00,000 under the Section 115BAC new-regime table applicable from AY 2026-27 (Finance Act 2025) — and its own deductions under the old regime (Sections 80C, 80D). HUF income is assessed in the HUF's hands as a separate person, not pooled with any member's individual income.

Any coparcener — including a married daughter — can demand partition. Section 171(9) of the ITA 1961 provides that where a partial partition has taken place after 31 December 1978, no claim of such partial partition shall be inquired into, and the family continues to be assessed "as if no such partial partition had taken place". On partition, Section 47(i) excludes from capital gains "any distribution of capital assets on the total or partial partition of a Hindu undivided family" — but note the recipient's cost of acquisition is deemed to be the previous owner's cost under Section 49(1), not the asset's value on the partition date.

What Is a Private Discretionary Trust?

A private trust is created under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882, through a trust deed, where the settlor transfers assets to trustees who hold them for named beneficiaries. Registration of the deed is compulsory where it relates to immovable property (Section 17, Registration Act, 1908). In a discretionary trust, trustees decide how much income or capital each beneficiary receives and when; in a determinate trust, shares are fixed and ascertainable.

Any person competent to contract can create one, irrespective of religion (Section 7, Indian Trusts Act, 1882), and every person capable of holding property may be a beneficiary (Section 9) — so trust deeds can accommodate blended families, stepchildren, future grandchildren as a class, and non-family members, flexibility an HUF, which can only benefit family members, does not offer.

Trust Taxation — The Critical Provisions

Under Section 161 of the ITA 1961, a trustee is assessed as a "representative assessee" — liable to assessment in the trustee's own name as if the income were the trustee's own beneficial income.

Under Section 164(1), where the individual shares of beneficiaries are indeterminate or unknown — that is, where trustees have discretion over distributions — "tax shall be charged on the relevant income or part of relevant income at the maximum marginal rate". "Maximum marginal rate" means the rate (including surcharge, if any) for the highest slab of an individual/AOP/BOI under the Finance Act of the relevant year (Section 2(29C), ITA 1961; Section 2(70), ITA 2025). For AY 2026-27 (rates in the Finance Act, 2026) that works out to up to about 42.74% — 30% top slab, plus 37% surcharge for income exceeding ₹5 crore, plus 4% Health and Education Cess — or about 39% where the income is chargeable under Section 115BAC and the 25% surcharge cap applies (Finance Act, 2025 proviso carried in the rate structure). This is the most misunderstood provision in trust planning: a discretionary trust's income does not flow through to beneficiaries at their individual slab rates. It is taxed at the highest possible rate at the trust level.

The first proviso to Section 164(1) changes this. Tax is charged "as if it were the total income of an association of persons" where, among other cases, none of the beneficiaries has other income above the AOP exemption limit or is a beneficiary under any other trust (proviso (i)), or the trust was declared by will and is the only trust so declared by that person (proviso (ii)). Where the trust income includes business profits, the second proviso narrows this further.

Key point: A discretionary trust's income is taxed at the Maximum Marginal Rate under Section 164(1) of the ITA 1961, not at the beneficiaries' slab rates — unless one of the Section 164(1) provisos applies (below).

If flow-through taxation at the beneficiary's slab rate is the goal, the trust must be a determinate trust with fixed shares — which eliminates distribution flexibility.

A further warning: if the settlor retains the power to revoke the trust, the trust's income is chargeable as the settlor's income (Section 61; Section 62 takes out of Section 61 a transfer by way of trust which is not revocable during the beneficiary's lifetime, provided the transferor derives no direct or indirect benefit). Income arising to the settlor's spouse or minor child from the settlement is likewise included in the settlor's total income (Section 64). A revocable trust provides no tax planning benefit and leaves succession unresolved.

HUF vs Trust — Planning Matrix

The ITA 2025 Transition

The ITA 2025 comes into force on 1 April 2026 for Tax Year 2026-27 onward (Section 1(3)). For AY 2026-27 (FY 2025-26), the ITA 1961 still applies in full, and filings for this year use ITA 1961 forms and section numbers.

From Tax Year 2026-27, ITA 2025 applies — including to structures created in 2026, whose deeds remain governed by the unchanged Indian Trusts Act, 1882. The trust and HUF concepts (separate HUF person, representative assessee, MMR for discretionary income, clubbing for revocable transfers) carry over in substance, but the provision numbers change: always verify the ITA 2025 section number in the gazette text before citing one.

Common Mistakes

Creating a discretionary trust purely for tax efficiency backfires: once trustees have distribution discretion, the MMR applies unless a Section 164(1) proviso fits, and families are often surprised by the top rate on trust income. A determinate trust avoids this, at the cost of flexibility.

Assuming an HUF is eternal is another error. Post-2005, daughters are coparceners in their own right and can demand partition — HUF-based estate planning is fragile for families with complex dynamics.

A revocable trust built for "controlled" succession eliminates the planning benefit entirely; an irrevocable deed requires careful upfront structuring. For trusts holding immovable property, the deed must be registered under the Registration Act, 1908 — a document requiring registration that is not registered cannot affect the immovable property and cannot be received as evidence of the transaction (Section 49).

Finally, families do not have to choose only one structure. An HUF for ancestral property income, individual holdings, and a private trust for controlled succession of business equity are separate legal and tax entities that can coexist.

I'm CA Harun Raaj, Visakhapatnam. If your family is weighing an HUF or a private trust for succession, reach out and we'll work through the structure that fits your facts.

---

See Also

• "Just open a HUF and get another ₹4 lakh exemption": what ITA 2025 actually says

Need help with this?

Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.