01Is BIS hallmarking mandatory even for my old stock?
If old stock is to be sold where mandatory hallmarking applies, BIS says old hallmarked jewellery without the six-digit HUID must be re-hallmarked before sale. BIS provided a transition period, but its current jeweller guidance does not permit a new sale merely because the item was part of pre-April 2023 stock. Exempt categories under the applicable Quality Control Order must be checked separately.
BIS jeweller FAQ, questions 18 and 23 · Mandatory Hallmarking Orders
02I take ₹1.95 lakh cash per invoice and split the billing. Am I covered?
No—the split does not create safety. Section 269ST separately tests aggregate receipts from one person in one day, a single transaction, and transactions relating to one event or occasion. A breach attracts a section 271DA penalty equal to the amount received, subject to the statutory defence for good and sufficient reasons.
Income-tax Act, section 269ST · Income-tax Act, section 271DA
03Do I need to register under PMLA?
S.O. 4713(E) dated 28 December 2020 brought dealers in precious metals and precious stones within the designated-business framework when they engage in cash transactions of ₹10 lakh or more, whether in one operation or linked operations. A jeweller entering that scope should complete FIU-IND onboarding and establish Principal Officer, due-diligence, recordkeeping and reporting controls; the exact gazette scope and later FIU guidance should be applied to the facts.
FIU-IND guidance for precious-metal and precious-stone dealers · FIU-IND PMLA notifications
04What if every cash sale is under ₹10 lakh?
The threshold cannot be tested invoice-by-invoice alone. Cash transactions that appear linked must be aggregated; a series of individually sub-₹10 lakh transactions within a month crossing the prescribed threshold is reportable as a connected series. An STR is a separate judgment based on suspicion and can apply irrespective of amount.
PMLA Maintenance of Records framework · FIU-IND dealer guidance
05Section 194Q or section 206C(1H)—which applies when I buy bullion?
For periods when both provisions operated, buyer-side section 194Q prevailed where its conditions were met: preceding-year buyer turnover above ₹10 crore and aggregate purchases from the resident seller above ₹50 lakh, with 0.1% TDS on the excess. Section 206C(1H) was withdrawn from 1 April 2025, so it is not a current competing seller-side levy, although historic-period reconciliations may still require the priority analysis.
Income-tax Act, section 194Q · Finance Act 2025 memorandum
06Old gold from a customer against new jewellery—GST on which value?
The new jewellery is ordinarily taxed on its full transaction value; the customer’s old gold is non-cash consideration and must be valued correctly. Rule 32(5)’s margin method is available only when the dealer buys and resells second-hand goods as such or after minor processing that does not change their nature, and no input tax credit was taken on the purchase. Melting old gold and manufacturing a new article normally does not satisfy that resale-as-such condition. A private customer’s sale of personal old jewellery is not presently subject to general section 9(4) RCM merely because the jeweller is registered.
CGST Rules, rule 32(5) · CBIC clarification on old gold
07Is composition at 1% sensible for a ₹1.2 crore jeweller?
It may be available within the ₹1.5 crore preceding-year threshold, subject to all section 10 conditions, but eligibility is not the same as suitability. The scheme denies input tax credit and restricts interstate outward supply. It may work where inputs carry little usable credit; it is commonly unattractive where imported stones, taxable services, job work or other input tax are material.
CBIC composition-scheme update
08On a Diwali day, an employee accepts ₹1.9 lakh three times from the same buyer. What is my exposure?
The ₹5.7 lakh daily aggregate breaches section 269ST even though each receipt is below ₹2 lakh, exposing the recipient to a section 271DA penalty equal to the prohibited receipt. ₹5.7 lakh by itself does not automatically cross the PMLA ₹10 lakh CTR threshold; it must be included in the month’s linked-transaction review, and an STR must be considered if the pattern is suspicious.
Income-tax Act, section 269ST · FIU-IND dealer guidance