Harun Raaj & AssociatesHarun Raaj & Associates
Trademark & IP Servicesvia IP India (TM Registry)

Trademark Objection

Trademark Objection

Start — upload documents, pay when ready →Talk to a CAWhatsApp us
SCOPEConfirmed in writing
TYPICAL TIMELINE21 days
APPLICABLE TOIndividual, Company

Regulatory Framework

When a trademark application is examined by the Trade Marks Registry, the Examiner may raise objections under Section 9 or Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 before accepting the mark for advertisement. Section 9 sets out the absolute grounds for refusal — marks that are devoid of distinctive character, that are purely descriptive of the goods or services, or that are likely to deceive or cause confusion as to the nature, quality, or geographical origin of the goods. Section 11 sets out the relative grounds for refusal — where the applied-for mark is identical or deceptively similar to an earlier registered or pending mark for identical or similar goods/services, creating a likelihood of confusion. Section 11(6) further protects well-known trademarks against use on unrelated goods and services where such use would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the earlier mark's reputation.

An Examination Report raising such objections must be responded to within the statutory period, failing which the application is treated as abandoned. Our response strategy typically involves distinguishing the applied-for mark on facts and prior use, submitting evidence of acquired distinctiveness or honest concurrent use, and, where necessary, requesting a hearing before the Registrar under the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. A well-prepared response at this stage is critical, since an unresolved objection prevents the mark from proceeding to advertisement in the Trade Marks Journal and eventual registration under Section 18.

Overview

Trademark objection services cover the response to the examination reports and the objections raised by the Trademarks Registry under the Trade Marks Act 1999 — the examination of the application under Section 18, the objections on the distinctiveness, the similarity with the prior marks, the descriptiveness and the other grounds under the Act, and the preparation and the filing of the response with the evidence and the arguments. The objection is the Registry's preliminary position on the mark, and the response is the applicant's case for why the mark should proceed.

The trademark application meets the Registry's examination before it proceeds — the report that raises the objections under the Trade Marks Act, and the response that answers them with the arguments and the evidence — the distinctiveness of the mark, the absence of the conflict with the prior registrations, the acquired distinctiveness where the mark has been used, and the other grounds. The response is filed within the prescribed period, and the matter proceeds to the hearing where the objection survives the response.

The cost of an un-answered objection is the abandoned application: the mark that was never examined on the applicant's case, the application that lapsed for the want of the response, and the brand protection that was lost with it.

This service is for applicants facing trademark objections. We review the examination report and the grounds, prepare the response with the evidence and the arguments under the Trade Marks Act 1999, file within the prescribed period, attend the hearing where required, and pursue the mark's registration so the objection is answered with the applicant's full case.

How It Works

  1. 1

    Objection & Grounds Review

    We review the examination report and the grounds raised.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this1 week
  2. 2

    Response Strategy

    We build the response strategy — distinctiveness, similarity, evidence.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this1 week
  3. 3

    Response Preparation

    We prepare the response with the evidence and the arguments.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this1 week
  4. 4

    Filing & Hearing

    We file within the period and attend the hearing.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this2-8 weeks
  5. 5

    Registration Pursuit

    We pursue the mark's registration to the grant.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does thisAs required

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has our trademark application been objected to under Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act 1999?
Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 lists absolute grounds for refusal, and the Registry raises an objection under Section 9(1) when the mark is devoid of distinctive character, consists exclusively of words that describe the quality, quantity, intended purpose, geographical origin, or other characteristics of the goods or services, or consists of marks that have become customary in the current language or trade practice. For example, a mark like 'FRESH JUICE' for a juice brand, or 'FAST DELIVERY' for a courier service, would typically attract a Section 9(1) objection. Section 9(2) grounds cover marks that are contrary to public policy or morality, or are deceptive. Unlike Section 11 (relative grounds based on similarity to existing marks), Section 9 objections go to the inherent registrability of the mark. The reply must either argue that the mark is inherently distinctive and does not fall within Section 9(1), or provide evidence of acquired distinctiveness under the proviso to Section 9(1) through long and extensive use in India.
What is the time limit to respond to a trademark examination report, and is it possible to seek a hearing instead of a written reply?
Under Rule 38(1) of the Trade Marks Rules 2017, an applicant must submit a written response to an examination report within 30 days from the date of issuance of the report by the Registry, which is now visible on the IP India e-filing portal. The 30-day period may be extended by a further 30 days on written request, making the maximum reply period 60 days. Along with or in addition to the written reply, the applicant may request a personal hearing before the Examining Officer, which is increasingly conducted via video conference. At the hearing, the applicant or their authorised agent (a registered trademark attorney or an advocate enrolled under the Advocates Act 1961) may present oral arguments and additional evidence in support of registrability. If the Examiner is satisfied, the mark is accepted and advertised in the Journal; if not, a final refusal is issued, which can be appealed to the High Court under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act 1999.
Our mark is similar to a registered mark in a different class — will the Section 11 objection be sustained?
Section 11(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1999 bars registration of a mark that is identical or similar to an earlier trademark in relation to identical or similar goods or services where there is a likelihood of confusion. If the goods or services are in genuinely different classes with no overlap in trade channels or consumer base, the likelihood of confusion may not arise, and this is a valid argument in the reply under Rule 38 of the Trade Marks Rules 2017. However, Section 11(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1999 creates an additional ground for marks with a reputation — where the later mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark, registration can be refused even for dissimilar goods. Whether the earlier mark has this level of repute is a factual question requiring evidence. The Trade Marks Registry Examination Guidelines and judicial precedents such as Honda Motors Co. Ltd. v. Charanjit Singh (2003, Delhi HC) provide the analytical framework for multi-class similarity assessments.
Can a trademark that was objected to still be used commercially while the objection is being resolved?
Yes. An examination report objection during the trademark application process does not prevent the applicant from continuing to use the mark commercially, since the mark remains an unregistered mark during the pendency of the application. Common law rights based on prior use are independent of registration and are enforceable through passing off actions under Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1999 read with the law of torts. However, an unregistered mark does not carry the statutory presumption of validity or the right to sue for infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 — only registered marks have those protections. The applicant should document all commercial use — invoices, advertisements, packaging — with dates clearly evidenced, as this use data strengthens the claim of acquired distinctiveness if a Section 9 objection needs to be overcome. The use should also be consistent with the description of goods/services in the application to avoid non-use vulnerability if registration is eventually obtained.
What grounds of objection appear under Section 11 that differ from Section 9?
Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 deals with relative grounds for refusal, which arise from the existence of earlier conflicting rights rather than from any inherent defect in the mark itself. Section 11(1) covers conflict with an earlier registered trademark in the same or similar class for identical or similar goods/services where there exists a likelihood of confusion. Section 11(2) covers conflict with an earlier trademark having a reputation in India, even for dissimilar goods, where the use of the later mark would constitute unfair advantage or cause detriment. Section 11(3) covers conflict with earlier rights arising from the law of passing off or copyright. In contrast to Section 9 objections which are about the mark's nature, Section 11 objections are entirely external — they depend on what is already registered or in use. A Section 11 objection can be overcome by obtaining a written consent from the proprietor of the cited earlier mark (known as a Consent Letter or Coexistence Agreement), which the Registry typically accepts unless the marks are identical and the goods are identical under the absolute bar imposed by the Directive.

Ready to get Trademark Objection?

File a request in under 2 minutes. Our team contacts you within 24 hours.

Start — upload documents, pay when ready →