"FEMA violations mean prosecution": what compounding actually costs you

An NRI in Dubai discovers his Indian brokerage account was never converted to a non-resident demat after he moved in 2019. Seven years of trades, all under a resident account. The advice he gets in a WhatsApp group: "Don't touch it. If you disclose, RBI will prosecute you and freeze your assets." So he does nothing, and the exposure compounds — in the ordinary sense, not the legal one.

That advice is wrong on the most fundamental point. FEMA contraventions are civil, not criminal. There is no prosecution, no arrest, no jail. Since the Foreign Exchange Management Act replaced FERA in 1999, the entire architecture is monetary. And the mechanism Parliament built specifically for people who want to fix a past mistake — compounding under Section 15 — is a settlement process, not a punishment process. Understanding what it actually costs is usually the difference between a Rs.1 lakh problem and an eight-figure one.

What the law actually says

Section 13 of FEMA, 1999 sets the penalty ceiling: up to three times the sum involved where the amount is quantifiable, or Rs.2,00,000 where it is not. If the contravention continues after the first day, a further penalty of up to Rs.5,000 per day may apply.

That is the maximum. It is not what compounding costs, and the confusion between the two is what keeps people paralysed.

Section 15 of FEMA, 1999 is the compounding provision. It allows any contravention under Section 13 — with one carve-out — to be compounded on application, within 180 days of the RBI receiving the application. The carve-out is Section 3(a), dealing with unauthorised dealing in foreign exchange (hawala-type transactions), which is compoundable only by the Directorate of Enforcement, not the RBI.

The operative procedural law today is the Foreign Exchange (Compounding Proceedings) Rules, 2024, which replaced the 2000 Rules. Two changes matter enormously for individuals:

• Application fee raised to Rs.10,000 plus GST (from Rs.5,000), payable by demand draft or NEFT at the time of filing.
• The 50% enhancement clause was deleted by amendment in April 2025. Previously, if you had compounded a contravention before, a subsequent application on the same subject matter attracted an automatic 50% loading on the computed amount. That linkage is gone. Each application now stands on its own facts.

On residency itself, note that Section 2(v) of FEMA defines "person resident in India" on a 182-day basis plus an intention test — and this is not the same as residency under the Income Tax Act. Under ITA 2025, Section 6 you may be a resident for income-tax purposes while being a non-resident under FEMA, or the reverse. The two Acts run on parallel tracks. Tax filings use Tax Year terminology under ITA 2025 (replacing "Previous Year" and "Assessment Year"), while FEMA reporting still runs on financial-year cycles. Getting one right does not fix the other.

Who decides your case, and what it costs

Jurisdiction is decided by the amount involved in the contravention, and this determines both the officer who hears you and, practically, how fast it moves:

For contraventions falling under FDI, ECB, ODI and branch/liaison office regulations, applications go to the relevant Regional Office of the RBI. Applications relating to Section 3(a) go to the Directorate of Enforcement.

Now the number people actually want. The RBI publishes a compounding matrix — a guidance framework for computing the amount — and for the reporting-delay category that captures the large majority of NRI and small-company cases, the formula is:

Fixed amount of Rs.1,00,000 + a variable component based on the amount involved and the period of delay.

The variable component for late-submission contraventions is calculated on a graded percentage of the amount involved, per year of delay, typically in the range of 0.025% to 0.15% depending on the category — with the graver categories (non-allotment of shares, exceeding sectoral caps, non-repatriation) attracting higher rates than pure filing delays.

The practical consequence: a delayed FC-GPR on a Rs.50 lakh inbound investment, filed two years late, typically compounds in the Rs.1.2 lakh to Rs.1.6 lakh range — not Rs.1.5 crore. The three-times-the-amount figure in Section 13 is a statutory ceiling that the RBI, in ordinary compounding practice, does not approach for technical and reporting contraventions.

Practical implications for NRIs

The account conversion trap. Under FEMA Notification 5(R), once you become a person resident outside India, resident savings accounts must be redesignated as NRO. Failing to do so is a contravention, but it is a reporting-and-status one, not a value one — and the amount involved is generally read as the balance or the transactions routed through it. This is the single most common NRI contravention and it is almost always cheap to fix and expensive to ignore.

The demat account. Resident demat holdings must move to a non-resident demat (NRO or NRE-designated) with the PIS/non-PIS framework applied correctly. Trades executed through a resident account post-departure are contraventions of FEMA Notification 20(R) / the Non-Debt Instruments Rules. The amount involved here is the transaction value, which is why a seven-year-old unconverted account gets expensive — not because the rate is high, but because the base grows with every trade.

Agricultural land. An NRI cannot acquire agricultural land, plantation property or a farmhouse in India. Inheritance is permitted; purchase is not. This one is not a reporting technicality, and compounding here is discretionary and materially more expensive.

The USD 1 million NRO-to-NRE limit. Repatriation beyond USD 1 million per financial year from NRO, without RBI approval, is a contravention on the excess. The Form 15CA (now Form 145 under ITA 2025) and Form 15CB (now Form 146 under ITA 2025) certification you file for the remittance is a tax compliance — it does not cure a FEMA limit breach. People routinely assume a CA-certified Form 146 means the remittance is FEMA-clean. It does not.

Voluntary disclosure is not penalised — the opposite. The RBI position is that compounding is intended to provide a route for voluntary admission and closure. A contravention detected by the RBI or ED first, rather than admitted by you, removes the compounding option in some circumstances entirely and moves the matter to adjudication under Section 13, where the three-times ceiling becomes a live risk. Waiting does not reduce exposure. It changes which door you walk through.

Compounding is not available if proceedings are already on. If adjudication under Section 16 has commenced, or the matter involves an ongoing ED investigation, or the contravention requires a prior approval that was never obtained and cannot now be granted, the application will be returned. The contravention must first be regularised — the approval obtained, the shares allotted, the funds repatriated — before it can be compounded.

Step-by-step: what to do

• Identify and date every contravention. List each one separately with the regulation contravened, the amount involved, the date the obligation arose, and the date it was (or will be) cured. The RBI computes per contravention, not per applicant.
• Regularise first. File the pending FC-GPR, FC-TRS, ODI Part I, ECB-2 or APR. Convert the account. Allot the shares. Bring the funds back. Compounding settles a past contravention that has since been cured — it does not cure a live one.
• Obtain the Contravention Letter / no-objection from the AD Bank. Your authorised dealer bank must confirm the facts and that the transaction has been regularised on its books. This is not optional and it is usually the slowest step — start it first.
• Prepare the application. Form as prescribed under the 2024 Rules, with: an undertaking that you are not under ED investigation, a copy of the Memorandum of Association (for entities), the latest audited balance sheet, and a detailed factual chronology. The chronology is the document that actually moves the number — a clear, dated, self-critical narrative that shows the contravention was inadvertent and promptly cured is worth more than any legal argument.
• Pay Rs.10,000 + GST by demand draft favouring "Reserve Bank of India" or by NEFT, and file with the correct Regional Office by amount and subject matter.
• Attend the personal hearing. It is optional — the RBI will decide on the record if you waive it — but attending is generally advisable where facts need explanation. You may appear personally or through an authorised representative.
• Pay within 15 days of the order. The compounding order specifies the amount and a 15-day payment window. Miss it and the order lapses; the RBI may then refer the matter for adjudication, and you cannot re-apply for compounding on that contravention.
• Retain the compounding certificate permanently. It is the evidence of closure that AD banks, auditors and future buyers of your Indian assets will ask for.

FAQ

Can I go to jail for a FEMA violation?
No. FEMA contraventions are civil. Section 13 provides for monetary penalties only. Imprisonment arises only under Section 14, and only for failure to pay a penalty already imposed after adjudication — not for the underlying contravention itself. The criminal-liability framing belongs to FERA, which was repealed in 1999.

How long does compounding take?
The RBI is bound by Section 15 to pass the order within 180 days of receiving a complete application. In practice, straightforward reporting-delay cases with clean documentation are typically disposed of in three to five months. The AD Bank contravention letter, which sits before the clock starts, is usually where the real delay lives — budget four to eight weeks for it.

If I have five separate contraventions, is it five applications?
No — one application covering all contraventions arising from the same set of facts, with each contravention separately identified and computed. The RBI issues a single order covering all of them. The compounding amounts are computed individually and totalled.

Does compounding remove the tax liability too?
No. They are entirely separate. A compounding order closes the FEMA exposure. Any income that was under-reported still has to be dealt with under ITA 2025 — through a revised or updated return, with interest under the relevant sections. An NRI regularising an unconverted account will frequently need to do both, and the FEMA closure has no effect on the tax position. Handle them as two parallel workstreams, not one.

---

For your specific situation, book a consultation at harunraaj.com

Need help with this?

Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.