Frequently Asked Questions
What types of indirect tax advisory does a CA firm provide?
Advisory covers: (a) GST rate and classification opinions — HSN/SAC classification letters with statutory analysis; (b) pre-transaction structuring — supply chain, composite/mixed supply analysis, and place of supply planning; (c) ITC optimisation — mapping blocked credits, Rule 42 reversal minimisation, ISD structure; (d) customs duty planning — FTA utilisation, SVB pricing, advance ruling applications; (e) FTP benefit structuring — AA, EPCG, RoDTEP eligibility; (f) Advance Pricing Agreement and Advance Rulings.
When is a pre-transaction indirect tax opinion critical?
Before: launching a new product or service (rate uncertainty); entering a new state (registration obligation, place of supply); making a large capital goods import (BCD, SWS, IGST implications); signing a multi-element contract (composite vs. mixed supply analysis); claiming a FTP benefit (AA, EPCG — wrong usage nullifies the licence); or an M&A transaction (ITC position, IGST on slump sale vs. itemised asset sale). After the transaction, changing the tax treatment creates amendment/reversal risks.
How does indirect tax litigation advisory work?
Litigation advisory covers: (a) drafting reply to show cause notices under Section 73/74 CGST Act or Section 28 Customs Act; (b) representation before the Adjudicating Authority, Commissioner (Appeals), CESTAT (for pre-GST excise/service tax), and GSTAT (when operational); (c) High Court/Supreme Court — briefing counsel on indirect tax matters; (d) advance rulings at AAR/AAAR; (e) settlement commission applications (for pre-GST matters under SVLDRS). The CA prepares the factual and legal matrix; the advocate argues.
What is the SVLDRS and is it still available?
Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme 2019 (SVLDRS) was a one-time settlement window for pre-GST disputes (excise, service tax, customs duties) — closed 30 June 2020. Disputes that were not settled under SVLDRS continue before CESTAT, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. For pre-GST matters (FY 2000–2017) still pending, conventional litigation is the only route. New disputes under GST law go through the Section 107/112 appeal structure and eventually GSTAT/High Court.
What is the role of a CA in an indirect tax due diligence?
In M&A indirect tax DD: (a) review GST return filing history and GSTR-9/9C for last 3 years for material reconciliation differences; (b) check open notices (GSTN portal — notices visible to registered taxpayers); (c) verify ITC position — any Section 73/74 demand, GSTR-2B mismatch, or Section 16(4) time-barred credit taken; (d) check customs import history for SVB-related party pricing alerts, EPCG/AA export obligation status; (e) quantify contingent indirect tax liability and include in deal terms (escrow or price reduction).
Related Tools
Use these free tools to check numbers, compare options, and prepare before you request the service.
Ready to get Indirect Tax Advisory?
File a request in under 2 minutes. Our team contacts you within 24 hours.