Harun Raaj & AssociatesHarun Raaj & Associates
Trademark & IP Services

IP Litigation Support

IP Litigation

Start — upload documents, pay when ready →Talk to a CAWhatsApp us
SCOPEConfirmed in writing

Regulatory Framework

Intellectual property litigation support covers enforcement and defence of trademark, copyright, and patent rights before Indian courts. Civil remedies for trademark infringement are set out in Section 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which empowers courts to grant injunctions (including ex parte and interim relief), and to award damages or an account of profits, along with orders for delivery-up or destruction of infringing goods and marks.

A significant structural change to the IP litigation landscape occurred with the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, which abolished the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) with retrospective effect from 4 April 2021. All appeals and matters that were pending before the IPAB — including trademark rectification and revocation appeals, and patent revocation proceedings — stand transferred to the jurisdictional High Courts. Original commercial IP disputes, including infringement and passing-off suits, continue to be heard by Commercial Courts / Commercial Divisions of High Courts constituted under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which prescribes specialised procedure — including case management hearings and provisions for summary judgment — for the speedy disposal of commercial IP disputes.

Our litigation support includes drafting and filing plaints, replies, and interim applications, coordinating with counsel on evidence and cross-examination strategy, and representing clients in rectification, opposition, and infringement proceedings before the relevant High Court or Commercial Court, in light of this post-2021 forum structure.

Overview

IP litigation support is the technical and the accounting work behind intellectual property disputes — the infringement analysis under the Patents Act 1970, the Trade Marks Act 1999 and the Copyright Act 1957, the evidence of the use and the sales, the computation of the damages and the accounts of profit, and the preparation of the documents and the experts' reports the litigation requires. The chartered accountant's role in IP litigation is the money side: what was sold, what was infringing, what was lost and what is owed.

The IP dispute is decided on the evidence as much as the law. The plaintiff must prove the ownership, the infringement and the damage; the defendant must prove the invalidity, the non-infringement or the lack of the loss. The financial evidence — the sales records, the royalty computations, the lost-profit analysis, the accounts of profit — is where the case is won or lost on the numbers.

The cost of weak financial evidence is the weak case: the damages that cannot be proved, the profits that cannot be computed, the claim that fails on the numbers even where the law is favourable. The courts decide the amounts on the evidence the parties bring, and the evidence the parties bring is the work product of the accountants.

This service is for businesses in IP disputes — as plaintiffs or defendants. We analyse the infringement and the use, compute the damages and the accounts of profit under the IP statutes, build the financial evidence — the sales, the costs, the lost profits, the royalties — prepare the experts' reports and the documents, and support the counsel and the proceedings with the numbers the case needs.

How It Works

  1. 1

    Case & Records Review

    We review the dispute and the financial records relevant to the claim.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this1 week
  2. 2

    Infringement & Use Analysis

    We analyse the alleged infringement and the use of the IP.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this1-2 weeks
  3. 3

    Damages & Profit Computation

    We compute the damages, the lost profits and the accounts of profit.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this1-2 weeks
  4. 4

    Evidence & Expert Report

    We build the financial evidence and the experts' reports for the case.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does this2-4 weeks
  5. 5

    Proceedings Support

    We support the counsel and the proceedings with the financial analysis.

    Harun Raaj & Associates does thisAs required

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CA's role in an IP infringement suit and which statute governs damages?
In trademark infringement suits under Section 135 of the Trade Marks Act 1999, the court may award actual damages or an account of profits. The CA prepares a forensic profit computation — reconstructing the infringer's revenue attributable to the infringing mark — to support either measure. A similar quantification applies to copyright suits under Section 55 of the Copyright Act 1957.
How are royalties or lost profits treated for income-tax purposes in the hands of the IP owner?
Royalties received from exploitation of a patent, copyright, or trademark are taxable as business income under Section 28 of the Income-tax Act 1961 (or the corresponding provision of ITA 2025 for Tax Year 2026-27 onwards). Where the IP owner is an individual not carrying on business, royalties from literary or artistic works may be claimed as a deduction of up to ₹3 lakh under Section 80QQB of ITA 1961 (AY 2026-27 and earlier).
Does a settlement or damages award attract GST?
Per CBIC Circular No. 178/10/2022-GST dated 3 August 2022, amounts received as damages or penalty for breach of contract — including IP infringement settlements — are not 'consideration for supply' and therefore not liable to GST. However, ongoing royalty arrangements for licensed use of a trademark or patent are taxable under SAC 9973 at 18% GST.
How is an IP asset valued for litigation or settlement purposes?
The three internationally recognised methods are: (1) Cost approach — historical development or acquisition cost; (2) Market approach — comparable licence transactions; (3) Income approach — discounted cash flows attributable to the IP. For patents, the Controller General of Patents under the Patents Act 1970 (Section 84 compulsory licence proceedings) references royalty rates prevailing in the industry as a benchmark. Our expert report documents the chosen method and assumptions for court or arbitral submission.
Can transfer pricing rules apply when IP is licensed between group companies?
Yes. Where an Indian entity licenses IP to or from a related foreign entity, the transaction is an 'international transaction' under Section 92B of ITA 1961, and arm's-length pricing must be demonstrated using one of the methods prescribed in Rule 10B of the Income-tax Rules 1962. The comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) or profit split method is most commonly used for IP. Form 3CEB (accountant's report) must be filed if the aggregate international transactions exceed ₹1 crore.

Ready to get IP Litigation Support?

File a request in under 2 minutes. Our team contacts you within 24 hours.

Start — upload documents, pay when ready →