Decode CPC Adjustment Codes: TDS Denied, 234B Interest and Rounding in 143(1)
Five adjustments cause most 143(1) demands: TDS credit denied on a 26AS mismatch, 234B interest for advance-tax shortfall, loss carry-forward disallowed under s.80, rounding differences, and 80C/80D disallowed on a Form 16 mismatch — each has a specific remedy, from AIS feedback to rectification.
Harun Raaj
Chartered Accountant · Harun Raaj & Associates
Five adjustments produce the overwhelming majority of s.143(1) demands from the Income-tax Act, 1961: TDS credit denied on a 26AS/AIS mismatch, 234B interest added for an advance-tax shortfall, a carried-forward loss disallowed because the return was filed late (s.80), rounding differences, and an 80C/80D deduction disallowed because it did not reconcile with the Form 16 data the CPC holds. Each code has a specific cause and a specific remedy — and the right remedy depends on whether the error is yours or the CPC's. Decode the adjustment first; pay second.
The five common adjustments — cause and remedy
The intimation displays each adjustment with a description in the "adjustment details" section. The labels below describe the adjustments by their substance; the exact code strings shown on your intimation may differ. on the current code format for your assessment year.
TDS denied: the most common, and the most fixable
A TDS mismatch is usually not a wrong claim at all — it is a timing or data gap. The credit you claimed exists, but the department's ledger does not yet show it. Before you do anything:
- Open Form 26AS and the AIS; find the specific TDS line.
- Check whether it is a late posting (deductor filed the TDS statement after you filed) — the most common cause.
- Check the PAN and section code — a wrong PAN or a wrong section (e.g., 194S filed under 194-IA) blocks the credit.
- If the entry is genuinely not yours, raise AIS feedback marking it incorrect.
- If the credit is yours but posted late, file a rectification u/s 154 after it appears.
The AIS is informational; the credit that counts is what 26AS shows. Claim only what reconciles, and document the rest.
234B interest: verify before you pay
Section 234B charges 1% per month (or part) on the shortfall from 1 April of the assessment year if your advance tax fell below 90% of the assessed tax. It is correct in two situations — you skipped advance tax, or your self-assessment was too low. It is wrong in one: you did pay advance tax and the CPC did not credit it. If you have the challans, that is a s.154 rectification, not a payment.
Loss carry-forward disallowed: the one you cannot fix
If the return was filed after the due date under s.139(1), s.80 bars the carry-forward of losses — business, capital, and other-source losses are all lost. There is no remedy at the 143(1) stage for a late-filed return; the loss is statutory. The adjustment is only avoidable by filing on time, which makes the AY 2026-27 due date (31 July 2027, or the extended date) the controlling deadline for anyone with a loss to carry.
Changed FY 2025-26: No change to the s.143(1) adjustment categories this year. What changed is data reach — AIS and SFT information now feeds more adjustments automatically, so TDS-mismatch and deduction-denial lines are driven by the same third-party data you can see on the portal. Check it before you respond.
Worked example: Sarika's three-line intimation
Persona: Sarika, salaried, files ITR-1 for AY 2026-27. Her intimation shows three adjustments:
- TDS denied — ₹6,000. She claimed ₹1,26,000 TDS; 26AS shows ₹1,20,000. Cause: her employer's March-quarter TDS posted after she filed.
- 234B interest — ₹1,120. Computed on a ₹80,000 shortfall in self-assessment.
- Rounding — ₹2. Trivial.
Step 1 — TDS line. Sarika opens 26AS, finds the ₹6,000 posted in May. It is hers. She files a rectification u/s 154 with the 26AS extract; the ₹6,000 credit is restored.
Step 2 — 234B line. She checks her bank challans. She actually paid ₹90,000 as advance tax in March — the full ₹80,000 shortfall plus more — but the CPC applied only part of it. She attaches the challan to the same rectification. The ₹1,120 is re-computed.
Step 3 — Rounding. The ₹2 she pays; it closes the demand.
Net result: the ₹6,000 TDS is restored and the 234B is reduced — a ₹7,120 swing fixed by one s.154 rectification, not by paying the demand as raised. on the evidence the CPC requires for a s.154 TDS restoration.
Frequently asked questions
1. Why was my TDS credit denied in 143(1)?
Because the claimed amount did not match 26AS/AIS — usually a late posting, wrong PAN, or wrong section code. Check 26AS first; the credit may simply have posted after you filed.2. What is 234B interest and why was it added?
Interest at 1% per month on the advance-tax shortfall from 1 April of the assessment year, added when your advance tax fell below 90% of the assessed tax.3. Can a carried-forward loss be restored after 143(1)?
No, if the return was filed late. Section 80 bars loss carry-forward for late returns; the disallowance at 143(1) is statutory and cannot be rectified.4. My 80D deduction was disallowed but I have the policy — what do I do?
File a rectification u/s 154 with the evidence (policy, premium receipt). If the deduction is correct, the CPC should restore it; if the claim was genuinely ineligible, the denial stands.5. Do I pay a ₹2 rounding difference?
Pay it — the amount is trivial, but an open demand line attracts s.220(2) interest if left. Clear it in the response window.6. What is the fastest way to fix a CPC error in a 143(1)?
File a rectification u/s 154 on the e-filing portal with the supporting document (26AS extract, challan, policy proof). It is faster and cheaper than an appeal.7. Where do I see the adjustment reasons?
In the intimation itself — the "adjustment details" section, and in your AIS/26AS on the portal. Download both before responding.---
Last verified: 2026-08-08 (FY 2025-26 / AY 2026-27)
Sources: s.143(1)(a), s.234B (advance-tax interest), s.80 (loss carry-forward bar), s.154 (rectification), s.199/203AA (TDS credit and 26AS), s.288B (rounding), s.220(2) (interest on unpaid demand), Income-tax Act, 1961. Adjustment-code display format flagged for CA verification. For a personalised read, use the Notice Explainer.
Go deeper with our hub guides
Statute-cited, section-by-section guides covering the same ground this article does.
Need help with this?
Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.