Wrong Schedule for Crypto (Other Sources vs VDA): Common ITR Mistakes and 139(9) Risk
30% plus 4% cess is the only correct rate for crypto, reported in Schedule VDA — putting gains in Schedule OS or CG is wrong and risks a s.139(9) defective return; fix it with a revised return u/s 139(5) before the deadline.
Harun Raaj
Chartered Accountant · Harun Raaj & Associates
Putting crypto gains in Schedule OS (other sources) or Schedule CG (capital gains) instead of Schedule VDA is wrong and is one of the most common reasons a crypto filer draws a s.139(9) defective-return notice from the Income-tax Act, 1961 — VDA has its own schedule, and its income is charged at 30% under s.115BBH plus 4% cess (= 31.2% up to ₹50L total income; up to ~35.88% at higher incomes with the 15% surcharge cap on s.115BBH income), not at your slab and not at capital-gains rates. The fix when the CPC flags it is a revised return in the correct form within the notice window — and if you have already filed a wrong schedule in an earlier year, a revised return under s.139(5) can still correct it before the deadline.
The three wrong homes for crypto, and the one right one
The department's systems validate the form against the income it detects (via AIS/SFT data and the s.194S TDS in 26AS). A filer who hides VDA in other sources at 5–30% slab, or in capital gains with the ₹1,25,000 s.112A exemption, produces a return that the processing engine flags for a structural mismatch.
Why "other sources" and "capital gains" are both wrong
- Schedule OS is wrong because VDA income is not slab income. Charging it at your marginal slab under-reports it — the Act's special rate for VDA is 30% + cess, and the ITR reflects that by routing VDA to its own schedule. The AIS/SFT data shows the transfer; a slab-rate treatment cannot be reconciled.
- Schedule CG is wrong because s.115BBH creates a special rate outside the capital-gains machinery — no holding-period split, no indexation, no s.112A exemption. The ₹1,25,000 LTCG exemption for listed equity (s.112A) does not apply to VDA. Reporting VDA as capital gains invites the same structural mismatch.
The right answer is mechanical: Schedule VDA → 30% + cess. No slab, no indexation, no exemption.
What a s.139(9) notice for a wrong schedule looks like
The Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) issues the notice when the validation engine detects that VDA income should have been in Schedule VDA and was not. The notice:
- Names the defect (wrong schedule / VDA not reported in Schedule VDA / ITR-1 used despite VDA income).
- Gives you 15 days from the date of intimation to rectify (extendable by the AO on application).
- Treats the return as not filed if you miss the window — which bars loss carry-forward (s.80) and leaves late-filing fees under s.234F in place.
How to respond and fix it
- Log in to the income-tax portal → Pending Actions → locate the s.139(9) notice.
- Read the defect code — confirm it is the VDA-schedule defect.
- Prepare the revised return in ITR-2 or ITR-3 (whichever applies) with Schedule VDA filled transaction-by-transaction.
- File the revised return — it supersedes the defective one.
- Submit your response to the notice, selecting "return filed" and entering the revised return's acknowledgment number.
- Keep a copy of the revised acknowledgment — you will need it if the CPC raises a follow-up.
Check your return before filing with the Defective Return Validator.
Already filed wrong in an earlier year? The revised-return window
If you filed AY 2023-24 or AY 2024-25 with crypto in the wrong schedule, s.139(5) lets you file a revised return at any time before the end of the relevant assessment year or before the assessment is completed, whichever is earlier — provided the original return was filed within the s.139(1) due date. The practical effect: an AY 2023-24 return could generally be revised up to 31 March 2025, and an AY 2024-25 return up to 31 March 2026. An AY 2025-26 return filed on time can be revised up to 31 March 2027. After that window, the only remedies are a rectification (s.154) for an apparent error or an appeal — neither is a substitute for a timely revised return. on the exact revision deadline for your assessment year.
Changed FY 2025-26: The Schedule VDA requirement is unchanged since AY 2023-24, but the wrong-schedule defect is now caught automatically — AIS/SFT data and the s.194S TDS in 26AS feed the validation engine, so VDA income reported as other sources or capital gains is flagged by the system rather than noticed only on assessment.
Worked example: Rohit's misplaced BTC gain
Persona: Rohit, salaried, sold Bitcoin in FY 2025-26 for a gain of ₹2,00,000. He files his AY 2026-27 return.
Wrong filing: Rohit reports the ₹2,00,000 under Schedule OS as "other income," taxed at his slab. His AIS shows the exchange SFT data and the 26AS shows ₹2,000 TDS under s.194S.
What happens: the CPC's engine matches the VDA transaction data against his return, finds no Schedule VDA entry, and issues a s.139(9) defective return notice.
The fix (within 15 days):
- Rohit refiles in ITR-2.
- Schedule VDA: type Bitcoin, acquisition date, transfer date, consideration, cost.
- Gain ₹2,00,000 × 30% = ₹60,000; cess 4% = ₹2,400 → ₹62,400.
- He claims the ₹2,000 s.194S TDS, leaving ₹60,400 payable (as self-assessment/advance tax, with interest if deferred).
- He responds to the notice with the revised acknowledgment.
The correct-filing result — ₹62,400 — is what he owed all along; the slab-rate figure he first filed was the defect.
See Also
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ITR schedule should crypto gains be reported in?
Crypto gains must be reported in Schedule VDA, not Schedule OS (other sources) or Schedule CG (capital gains). VDA has its own schedule and its income is charged at 30% under s.115BBH plus 4% cess.
What happens if I put crypto gains in the wrong schedule?
Putting crypto gains in Schedule OS or Schedule CG instead of Schedule VDA is one of the most common reasons a crypto filer draws a s.139(9) defective-return notice. The CPC flags this automatically.
How do I fix a wrong crypto schedule after filing?
The fix when the CPC flags it is a revised return in the correct form within the notice window. If you have already filed a wrong schedule in an earlier year, a revised return under s.139(5) can still correct it.
Need help with this?
Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.