Putting crypto gains in Schedule OS (other sources) or Schedule CG (capital gains) instead of Schedule VDA is wrong and is one of the most common reasons a crypto filer draws a s.139(9) defective-return notice from the Income-tax Act, 1961 — VDA has its own schedule, and its income is charged at 30% under s.115BBH plus 4% cess (= 31.2% up to ₹50L total income; up to ~35.88% at higher incomes with the 15% surcharge cap on s.115BBH income), not at your slab and not at capital-gains rates. The fix when the CPC flags it is a revised return in the correct form within the notice window — and if you have already filed a wrong schedule in an earlier year, a revised return under s.139(5) can still correct it before the deadline.

The three wrong homes for crypto, and the one right one

Where filers put VDA gains	Is it correct?	What happens
Schedule VDA (ITR-2/ITR-3)	✅ Correct	Taxed at 30% + 4% cess under s.115BBH
Schedule OS — "income from other sources"	❌ Wrong	Taxed at your slab (too low); risks s.139(9) defect flag
Schedule CG — capital gains	❌ Wrong	Treated as capital gains (wrong rate/holding-period logic); defect flag
ITR-1 with crypto anywhere	❌ Wrong	ITR-1 has no Schedule VDA; defective by design

The department's systems validate the form against the income it detects (via AIS/SFT data and the s.194S TDS in 26AS). A filer who hides VDA in other sources at 5–30% slab, or in capital gains with the ₹1,25,000 s.112A exemption, produces a return that the processing engine flags for a structural mismatch.

Why "other sources" and "capital gains" are both wrong

Schedule OS is wrong because VDA income is not slab income. Charging it at your marginal slab under-reports it — the Act's special rate for VDA is 30% + cess, and the ITR reflects that by routing VDA to its own schedule. The AIS/SFT data shows the transfer; a slab-rate treatment cannot be reconciled.
Schedule CG is wrong because s.115BBH creates a special rate outside the capital-gains machinery — no holding-period split, no indexation, no s.112A exemption. The ₹1,25,000 LTCG exemption for listed equity (s.112A) does not apply to VDA. Reporting VDA as capital gains invites the same structural mismatch.

The right answer is mechanical: Schedule VDA → 30% + cess. No slab, no indexation, no exemption.

What a s.139(9) notice for a wrong schedule looks like

The Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) issues the notice when the validation engine detects that VDA income should have been in Schedule VDA and was not. The notice:

Names the defect (wrong schedule / VDA not reported in Schedule VDA / ITR-1 used despite VDA income).
Gives you 15 days from the date of intimation to rectify (extendable by the AO on application).
Treats the return as not filed if you miss the window — which bars loss carry-forward (s.80) and leaves late-filing fees under s.234F in place.

How to respond and fix it

Log in to the income-tax portal → Pending Actions → locate the s.139(9) notice.
Read the defect code — confirm it is the VDA-schedule defect.
Prepare the revised return in ITR-2 or ITR-3 (whichever applies) with Schedule VDA filled transaction-by-transaction.
File the revised return — it supersedes the defective one.
Submit your response to the notice, selecting "return filed" and entering the revised return's acknowledgment number.
Keep a copy of the revised acknowledgment — you will need it if the CPC raises a follow-up.

Check your return before filing with the Defective Return Validator.

Already filed wrong in an earlier year? The revised-return window

If you filed AY 2023-24 or AY 2024-25 with crypto in the wrong schedule, s.139(5) lets you file a revised return at any time before the end of the relevant assessment year or before the assessment is completed, whichever is earlier — provided the original return was filed within the s.139(1) due date. The practical effect: an AY 2023-24 return could generally be revised up to 31 March 2025, and an AY 2024-25 return up to 31 March 2026. An AY 2025-26 return filed on time can be revised up to 31 March 2027. After that window, the only remedies are a rectification (s.154) for an apparent error or an appeal — neither is a substitute for a timely revised return. on the exact revision deadline for your assessment year.

Changed FY 2025-26: The Schedule VDA requirement is unchanged since AY 2023-24, but the wrong-schedule defect is now caught automatically — AIS/SFT data and the s.194S TDS in 26AS feed the validation engine, so VDA income reported as other sources or capital gains is flagged by the system rather than noticed only on assessment.

Worked example: Rohit's misplaced BTC gain

Persona: Rohit, salaried, sold Bitcoin in FY 2025-26 for a gain of ₹2,00,000. He files his AY 2026-27 return.

Wrong filing: Rohit reports the ₹2,00,000 under Schedule OS as "other income," taxed at his slab. His AIS shows the exchange SFT data and the 26AS shows ₹2,000 TDS under s.194S.

What happens: the CPC's engine matches the VDA transaction data against his return, finds no Schedule VDA entry, and issues a s.139(9) defective return notice.

The fix (within 15 days):

Rohit refiles in ITR-2.

Schedule VDA: type Bitcoin, acquisition date, transfer date, consideration, cost.

Gain ₹2,00,000 × 30% = ₹60,000; cess 4% = ₹2,400 → ₹62,400.

He claims the ₹2,000 s.194S TDS, leaving ₹60,400 payable (as self-assessment/advance tax, with interest if deferred).

He responds to the notice with the revised acknowledgment.

The correct-filing result — ₹62,400 — is what he owed all along; the slab-rate figure he first filed was the defect.

Frequently asked questions

1. Where do I report crypto gains in the ITR?

Schedule VDA in ITR-2 or ITR-3. Schedule OS and Schedule CG are both wrong homes for VDA income.

2. Why is reporting crypto as "other sources" wrong?

Because VDA income is charged at a flat 30% + cess under s.115BBH, not at your slab rate. Reporting it as other sources under-reports it and triggers a s.139(9) defect.

3. Why is reporting crypto as capital gains wrong?

Because s.115BBH is a special rate outside the capital-gains machinery — no holding period, no indexation, no s.112A exemption. Capital-gains treatment cannot be reconciled with the department's data.

4. What happens if I get a s.139(9) notice for the wrong schedule?

You have 15 days to refile in the correct form with Schedule VDA completed. If you miss the window, the return is treated as not filed and loss carry-forward is barred.

5. Can I still fix a wrong-schedule return from an earlier year?

Possibly, via s.139(5) — a revised return can be filed before the end of the relevant assessment year or before assessment, whichever is earlier, if the original return was filed on time. Verify the deadline for your year. [VERIFY]

6. Does the ₹1,25,000 LTCG exemption apply to crypto?

No. The s.112A exemption is for listed equity and equity-oriented funds only. VDA gets no exemption and no indexation.

7. What if the CPC says my return was defective but I disagree?

You can respond disagreeing, but for the VDA-schedule defect the engine is usually right. Confirm with a CA; if you were correct, submit a reasoned response and, if needed, seek an extension first.

---

Last verified: 2026-08-08 (FY 2025-26 / AY 2026-27)

Sources: s.115BBH (VDA special rate), s.2(47A) (VDA definition), s.139(5) (revised return), s.139(9) (defective return), s.80 (loss carry-forward barred on late returns), s.234F (late-filing fee), s.112A (listed-equity exemption — not applicable to VDA), Schedule VDA instructions (ITR-2/ITR-3), Income-tax Act, 1961. Revised-return deadline flagged [VERIFY]. Check your return before filing with the Defective Return Validator.

---

Need help with this?

Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.

Get Started →Talk to a CA

Wrong Schedule for Crypto (Other Sources vs VDA): Common ITR Mistakes and 139(9) Risk