"Professional tax is a central tax on professionals": What the law actually says

Ask most salaried employees why ₹200 disappears from their payslip every month and you will hear one of three wrong answers: that it is a central government levy, that it applies only to doctors, lawyers and chartered accountants because it is called professional tax, or that it is optional if the employer forgets to deduct it. All three are wrong, and the third one is expensive — for the employer, not the employee.

Professional tax is not levied by the Union at all. It is a state tax, drawing its authority from Article 276 of the Constitution of India, which permits a State Legislature to tax "professions, trades, callings and employments." That same Article caps the levy at ₹2,500 per person per year — a ceiling fixed in 1988 and never revised since. Every state that levies professional tax works within that ₹2,500 annual wall, which is why the slabs across states look strangely similar despite being separate laws.

What the law actually says

The constitutional source. Article 276(2) allows a state to tax professions, trades, callings and employments, notwithstanding that such income is also taxed under the Income Tax Act. Article 276(2) proviso fixes the maximum at ₹2,500 per annum per person. There is no central Professional Tax Act. What exists instead is a separate statute in each levying state — the Karnataka Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1976; the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975; the Telangana Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1987; the West Bengal State Tax on Professions Act, 1979, and so on.

Where it sits in income tax law. Under the old Income Tax Act 1961, professional tax paid was deductible from salary income under Section 16(iii). Under the Income Tax Act 2025, the corresponding deduction sits in the salary computation provisions under Section 19 read with Schedule II, which carries forward the same three salary deductions — standard deduction, entertainment allowance for government employees, and tax on employment. The substance is unchanged: professional tax actually paid during the tax year is deductible from salary income.

The critical limitation people miss: this deduction is available only under the old regime. If you are in the new regime — which is the default under ITA 2025 unless you affirmatively opt out — professional tax is deducted from your bank account and gives you nothing back in your tax computation. It is a pure ₹2,400 or ₹2,500 annual cost.

"Tax Year" replaces "Previous Year." ITA 2025 abolishes the Previous Year / Assessment Year duality. For professional tax, this matters when you compute the Section 19 deduction: you claim what was paid during the Tax Year 2026-27, not what was accrued or what your employer showed as a liability.

Which states levy it, and which do not

Professional tax is currently levied in roughly seventeen states and union territories. The significant ones for most employers: Karnataka, Maharashtra, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Odisha, Assam, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Meghalaya, Tripura, Sikkim, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram and Puducherry.

Notably absent: Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Punjab (except a development-tax variant), Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Goa, Jammu & Kashmir, Chandigarh and the Andaman & Nicobar Islands. A company headquartered in Gurugram with a Bengaluru development centre has no professional tax obligation for its Gurugram staff and a full obligation for its Bengaluru staff — a distinction that trips up first-time multi-state employers constantly.

Karnataka

Karnataka's slab was simplified with effect from 1 April 2025:

The annual liability caps at ₹2,400 for a full-year employee. Karnataka does not levy a higher February instalment for salaried employees — that is a Maharashtra feature that frequently gets misapplied by payroll software configured on a national template.

Maharashtra

Maharashtra retains a graded slab and a gender distinction:

The February loading of ₹300 exists purely to push the annual total to exactly ₹2,500 — the constitutional ceiling. Twelve months at ₹200 is ₹2,400; eleven months at ₹200 plus one at ₹300 is ₹2,500.

Telangana

Annual maximum ₹2,400. Andhra Pradesh mirrors this structure almost exactly, which is unsurprising given the shared statutory lineage.

Practical implications for employers

The deduction duty is statutory, not contractual. Every professional tax statute makes the employer the deducting and depositing agent for its employees. If you fail to deduct, the state does not chase the employee — it recovers from you, along with interest (typically 1.25% to 2% per month depending on the state) and penalty. In Karnataka, penalty under the 1976 Act can run to 50% of the tax due; in Maharashtra, interest plus a penalty of up to 10% of the amount unpaid.

Two registrations, not one. Maharashtra makes this explicit and other states follow the same logic:

• PTEC (Professional Tax Enrolment Certificate) — for the entity itself, the company, LLP, firm or proprietor, as a person carrying on a trade. This is a flat annual levy (₹2,500 in Maharashtra).
• PTRC (Professional Tax Registration Certificate) — for the employer's obligation to deduct from employees' salaries and remit.

A private limited company with employees in Maharashtra needs both. A company with no employees in Maharashtra but a registered office there still needs PTEC. Getting this wrong — obtaining PTRC and skipping PTEC, or vice versa — is the single most common professional tax defect we see in compliance reviews.

Registration is location-driven, not headquarters-driven. The obligation attaches to the state where the employee actually works. A Chennai employee of a Bengaluru company owes Tamil Nadu professional tax, not Karnataka. Post-2020 remote work has made this messy: an employee formally attached to the Bengaluru office but working permanently from Hyderabad creates a genuine exposure question. The defensible position is to follow the employee's actual place of work and register in that state.

Directors and partners are separately liable. A director drawing remuneration is an employee for professional tax purposes in most states. A working partner in an LLP is typically covered under the enrolment (PTEC-equivalent) head rather than the deduction head. Non-executive directors drawing only sitting fees generally fall outside the salary head — but check the specific state statute, because Maharashtra and West Bengal read this more expansively than Karnataka.

Filing frequency varies by size. Maharashtra requires monthly PTRC returns where the previous year's liability exceeded ₹1,00,000, and annual returns below that threshold. Karnataka requires monthly remittance by the 20th of the following month and an annual return in Form 5A. Telangana requires monthly payment by the 10th. Do not assume a common calendar.

Step-by-step: what to do

• Map your employee footprint by state of actual work — not by payroll entity, not by registered office. Build a simple headcount-by-state table before anything else.
• Strike out the non-levying states. If your entire workforce sits in Delhi, Haryana, UP and Rajasthan, you have no professional tax obligation and no registration to obtain. Stop here.
• For each levying state, obtain both registrations where the state's statute provides for them — enrolment for the entity, registration for the employer deduction obligation. Karnataka: e-PRERANA portal. Maharashtra: MahaGST portal. Telangana: the Commercial Taxes Department portal.
• Configure payroll per state, not on a national template. Load the correct slab, the correct exemption threshold, the gender distinction where it exists (Maharashtra), and the February loading where it applies (Maharashtra, and Karnataka for enrolled persons).
• Deduct in the month the salary is paid, remit by that state's due date, and preserve the challan. The challan is your evidence in an assessment; the payslip is not.
• File the periodic return on the state's cycle — monthly or annual depending on the state and your liability quantum.
• Reflect the deduction in Form 16 Part B under the tax-on-employment head, so employees in the old regime can actually claim it under Section 19 of ITA 2025.
• Reconcile annually. Total professional tax deducted per employee should equal the state's annual cap or the pro-rated amount for a part-year employee — never more.

FAQ

Can I claim professional tax as a deduction under the new tax regime?

No. Under ITA 2025, the tax-on-employment deduction sits within the salary provisions available only to taxpayers who have opted out of the default new regime. If you are in the new regime, professional tax reduces your take-home pay and gives you nothing back at filing. For most salaried taxpayers the new regime still wins overall, but you should treat the ₹2,400–₹2,500 as a sunk annual cost, not a deduction.

My employer never deducted professional tax. Do I owe it personally?

The state's recovery machinery targets the employer, not you. The employer is liable for the tax, interest and penalty. However, if you are a self-employed professional, consultant or a partner drawing from a firm, the enrolment liability is yours directly and no employer stands between you and the state.

I moved from Bengaluru to Gurugram in September. What happens to my professional tax?

Your Karnataka liability stops when you cease to work in Karnataka. Haryana does not levy professional tax, so from your Gurugram start date there is nothing to deduct. You will have paid a pro-rated Karnataka amount for the months you worked there, and that pro-rated figure — not ₹2,400 — is what you claim under the old regime.

Is the ₹2,500 cap per employer or per person?

Per person, per year, across all sources within that state. If you hold two jobs in Maharashtra simultaneously, your combined professional tax cannot exceed ₹2,500 for the year — you declare the second employment to one employer and the deduction is adjusted. If your two jobs sit in two different states, each state levies independently up to its own ceiling, because Article 276 caps the levy by a state, not the aggregate across states.

---

For your specific situation, book a consultation at harunraaj.com

Harun Raaj & Associates — Chartered Accountants

Need help with this?

Our team handles the paperwork. You focus on your business.